Craft Unbound Rotating Header Image

craft

A challenge for Indiana Jones

It’s Cicely & Colin Rigg award time. This recurrent prize exhibition is a significant opportunity to promote and recognise those artists specialising in particular craft media. Nurtured and hosted by the National Gallery of Victoria, it has previously featured the best of Victorian ceramics, metalwork, jewellery and textiles. Now the focus is on furniture, in particular seating.

Despite its positive impact, something irks about this award. Since the NGV move into Federation Square, the award has undergone a significant name change. Initially a craft award, it has been re-titled as an award in ‘contemporary design.’ This name change reflects the aspirational nature of the NGV, particularly its celebration of architecture as a creative practice. There’s nothing wrong with an overtly elitist institution, even it if only provides something to react against. And Melbourne’s thriving design culture is certainly to be celebrated (with two simultaneous international design festivals, two fashion festivals and a design-focused Melbourne International Festival, there’s certainly no lack of celebration).

But should design come at the expense of craft? Information about the award retrospectively categorises crafts like ceramics as ‘contemporary design disciplines’. While craft and design are certainly complementary, it is a serious mistake to think that one is simply a more updated version of the other. The focus of design is its utility in everyday life. The emphasis is less on how something is made, than what it is made for. By contrast, materials and processes are intrinsic to our apprehension of ceramics. As widely recognised in the many craft texts published recently, materials have their own powerful language of expression.

As our leading state institution, the NGV has a responsibility to teach audiences about the nature of craft, and how it informs and adds value to our appreciation of objects.

While ‘craft’ might be a dirty word at the NGV, its revival is being lead by designers themselves, such as the Dutch Maarten Baas. How does the NGV engage with the craft boutiques mushrooming around Melbourne?

The day will come when the NGV can show an appreciative audience the wonderful stories of craft that are housed in its vaults. Indiana Jones as curator?

Dark forces in the sunshine state

DSCF3925

DSCF3925

While the rest of Brisbane was roaring for its state rugby team tonight, a ‘quiet revolution’ was taking place at the Queensland University of Technology Art Museum. Catriona Brown (left) had curated an exhibition Craft Revolution, which featured work from strongly located contemporary craftspersons and proud craft guilds. At a panel with Kylie Johnson (centre) and Robyn Daw (right), we talked about craft’s place in the world today.

There was much talk about the importance of craft as a form of local production. Kylie talked about resisting the lure of making her work off-shore. While local in ethic, there was great interest in the shared struggles with craft scenes in other countries, such as in Chile and South Africa.

Revolution? Well, it doesn’t have the extreme radicalism that you might associate with the term. There are no craft guerilla organisations blowing up art galleries or IKEA outlets. But there’s certainly a move to home-grown forms of resistance. Let them bake cakes!

Craft has much to live up to. Luckily there are some passionate advocates on the front line.

Is Craft Revolutionary?

If you are in the mood for some subversive speculations, and you happen to be in Queensland’s capital, or thereabouts, you might find this event of some interest:

Forum: Is Craft Revolutionary?
02.07.08
Wednesday 2 July 6-7pm @ QUT Art Museum
2 George Street (next to the City Botanic Gardens) Brisbane
http://www.artmuseum.qut.com/visit/

This forum will pose the question of whether craft is revolutionary. The speakers will explore the slow process of craft making, the community nature of the practice, the craft-art link, the future of craft and the different movements of craft. Speakers include Kevin Murray, Robyn Daw and Kylie Johnson.
In conjunction with the exhibition Craft Revolution.

Their ‘artesanía’ is our ‘folk-art’

DSCF3466

DSCF3466

The in-flight magazine for LanChile identifies the position of craft in Latin America. It uses the Spanish work ‘artesanías’, which is usually translated as ‘craft’. However, in in the bi-lingual magazine, it is translated instead as ‘folk-art’.

Why use this term? The writer María José Villanueva positions artsesanía as a counterbalance to globalisation. It responds to questions about who we are and where we are coming from:

Folk art, now updated with a node to contemporary design, continues to provide answers to these existential questions, but with a twist: ‘folk chic’ or folk-art is emerging as a commercial niche that stands in stark contrast to mass-produced homogeneity.

These are noble sentiments which position craft as an alternative to dominant trends in modernity. But why ‘folk-art’? What has happened in the process of ‘updating’?

‘Craft’ has more of an emphasis on skill. It most often represents a body of techniques that are preserved and reproduced by a group of skilled practitioners. As such, it can be elitist and exclusive.

‘Folk-art’ is more democratic. It responds to a humanist sentiment and celebrates expression and the handmade.

While ‘folk-art’ seems more appropriate to our times, it does come at a cost. The demands a much lower level of skill than traditional craft. Ironically, it is a much more urban phenomenon, as harried city-dwellers seek the imaginary sanctuary of the handmade object.

The same could be said for the ‘neo-folk’ scene in Melbourne. What’s curious here is that the term ‘artesanía’ contains both traditional and modern concepts. It is only in the English word of ‘folk’ that the urban concerns are expression. I hope to find out more about the way this term operates, particularly in Chilean universities where craft is still taught.